Last night, I appeared on Michael Lofton’s podcast Reason & Theology, along with a frequent contributor named “Riverrun.” We talked about Taylor Marshall’s book Infiltration. There was so much to cover, however, that there will be a part two next week on May 26 at 6 p.m. (Central).
When the Holy See published the text of the third part of the Secret of Fátima in 2000, she offered two things: an historical explanation of the facts as well as an interpretation of the third part. For twenty-one years, the explanation and interpretation have stood as the “official” stance of the Church. As time passes, and more knowledge and information about Fátima becomes available, occasion has arisen for us to reconsider some aspects of the Church’s official stance. This essay shall examine some of the reasons for a fresh look.
Dr. Joseph Shaw over with the Latin Mass Society in England recently interviewed me. We talked about some subjects of much import to many traditionalist Catholics: the third part of the secret of Fátima, Annibale Bugnini, Bella Dodd, and AA-1025 (Marie Carré). It is broken into two parts: